VIOLATION OF US CONSTITUTION
By Lynn Stuter
September 23, 2011
September 18, 2011
Like many of you, I recently received a “census” survey from the Republican National Committee. I learned, a long time ago, that the answers to surveys were found in the wording of the questions. In other words, survey participants are led to the wanted answer by the wording of the questions.
The survey was accompanied, of course, by the requisite request for money.
At first I was going to toss the whole thing. The RNC doesn’t really want to know what the American people think, ergo the survey set up to elicit the wanted responses, just the check enclosed – thank you very much.
Then I decided that since they had given me the opportunity to communicate with them, via a return postage-paid envelope, why should I miss the opportunity to tell them what I really think.
Thus, I wrote and sent the following letter to the RNC –
September 21, 2011
Republican National Committee
310 First Street SE
PO Box 96994
Since you have been so gracious as to provide me the opportunity to share with you my thoughts on the current health of the United States, I have chosen to take you up on that, just not in the form of your choosing but of my choosing; surveys being so disingenuous in form and purpose.
You ask the #1 priority of the citizens of this country.
There is no greater priority, at this time, then the removal from the Oval Office of an individual who was ineligible to the office of president in the first place. Barack Hussein Obama was not eligible to the office of president when he declared his candidacy, he was not made eligible by the election of 2008, the certifying of that election by Congress in January 2009, or by his inauguration on 20 January 2009. He was, and remains, ineligible to the office of president.
He is illegally, and in violation of the U.S. Constitution, remaining in that office.
Barack Hussein Obama does not meet the definition of natural born citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution, Article II, Clause 5. As affirmed by Minor vs Happersett, 88 US 162, natural born requires two American parents. This conforms with the definition of natural born upon which the Founding Fathers relied in writing this clause – Vatell’s Law of Nations, Section 212, which defines natural born as two citizen parents and born on the soil of the nation.
Whether Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii or somewhere else is, as you are all quite well aware, of no relevance. The fact that his father was a British subject, at the time of his birth, makes it very apparent that Barack Hussein Obama does not fall under the definition of natural born.
Every Republican, every Democrat, every Independent takes an oath of office to protect and defend the United States Constitution. Yet every Republican, every Democrat, and every Independent voted to certify the electoral college in January 2009, knowing full well that Obama was ineligible to the office of president, and therefore, was and remains an illegal president.
This refusal of elected officials to uphold their oaths of office, Republicans included, has resulted in a constitutional crisis in which money has been appropriated and spent, and laws have been passed and enforced, under the signature of an illegal executive officer holder.
In the same vein, American military forces have been ordered to areas of conflict and have suffered casualties as a result. As Barack Hussein Obama is not the legal president of this country, the deaths incurred as a result of his orders, are nothing short of murder. Every Congressman and woman, who has done nothing to address the illegal status of Obama, is complicit in those murders.
The answer to constituents by Republican Congressmen and women, has been a canned response, pointing the finger at the courts. And the courts have, in response, pointed the finger at Congress. And the issue of an illegal office holder in the White House and Oval Office has resulted in many Americans coming to the realization that the corruption in Washington DC is not Democrats, Republicans or Independents, it’s everyone because this conspiracy to keep an illegally sitting official could not continue if the Republicans and Independents refused to go along with it.
It also makes a decided statement that the corruption is so deep, so wide-spread, so engrained in Washington DC, that nothing short of removing every incumbent, cleaning out the den of thieves and reprobates now controlling the federal bureaucracy, repealing the last 100 years of mostly unconstitutional laws, and returning to the very limited form of government established by our United States Constitution is the only possible avenue to saving our nation from the
destructive path currently being pursued by all concerned in Washington DC.
You can call those of us who know that Obama is not the legal president of the United States whatever you want; you can scream racism at the tops of your voices; you can employ the help of the mainstream media in disseminating disinformation; you can pollute the air with volumes of irrelevant information; but none of this changes the fact that Obama is not eligible to the office of president; is not the legal president of the United States.
Subscribe to the NewsWithViews Daily News
Enter Your E-Mail Address:
Under the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 10, it is the sworn duty of Congress to “define and punish … offences against the law of nations …”
This makes it apparent that it is the sworn duty of the U.S. Congress to remove an ineligible, and therefore illegal, office holder from the White House and Oval Office.
Unless and until the Republicans in Congress take their oath of office seriously, there are a growing number of Americans who have no intention of returning Republican incumbents to Washington DC.
/s/ Lynn M
It is long past time that the Republicans either uphold their oaths of office and remove an ineligible executive office holder or admit that they are just as much a part of the problem as are the Democrats, whom we already know are complicit.
© 2011 Lynn M. Stuter – All Rights
Activist and researcher, Stuter has spent the last fifteen years researching systems theory and systems philosophy with a
particular emphasis on education as it pertains to achieving the sustainable global environment. She home schooled two daughters. She has worked with legislators, both state and federal, on issues pertaining to systems governance, the sustainable global environment and education reform. She networks nationwide
with other researchers and a growing body of citizens concerned about the transformation of our nation from a Constitutional Republic to a participatory democracy. She has traveled the United States and lived overseas.
Web site: www.learn-usa.com